Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new
2006-01-20 15:41:13
Just curious, and playing a little devils advocate, but does it buy
anything to mirror over raid5? Wouldn't it be more efficient (processor
on the san, and storage) just to put volumes out there and let TSM
manage them? You would want to have the mirrored volumes on separate
physical drives (preferably in different trays, etc) also.
Suggestions?
Privileged and Confidential: The information contained in this e-mail message
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended
recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail, and delete the original message.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- DB & LOG Volume layout - new, David Longo
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new,
Jack Coats <=
- Message not available
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Dirk Kastens
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Allen S. Rout
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Dirk Kastens
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Allen S. Rout
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Lloyd Dieter
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Richard Rhodes
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Allen S. Rout
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Richard Rhodes
|
|
|