ADSM-L

Re: exclude directory structure

2005-11-25 11:27:29
Subject: Re: exclude directory structure
From: Farren Minns <fminns AT WILEY.CO DOT UK>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:26:14 +0000
OK, to all

Regarding the move to unicode file spaces. Is this something that people
are doing (have done), as a matter of course or just if the need arises.
For me this is the first time I have come across the problem of some files
not backing up correctly and I'm a little loath to now be faced with
backing up our entire client base again.

What are your thoughts

Farren
|-----------------------------+-------------------------------------------|
|   Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU> |                                          
 |
|   Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor |                                           |
|   Manager"                  |                                         To|
|   <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>    |                            
[email protected]|
|                             |                            T.EDU          |
|   25/11/2005 15:36          |                                         cc|
|                             |                                           |
|         Please respond to   |                                    Subject|
|         "ADSM: Dist Stor    |                            Re: [ADSM-L]   |
|             Manager"        |                            exclude        |
|      <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> |                            directory     
 |
|                             |                            structure      |
|                             |                                           |
|                             |                                           |
|                             |                                           |
|                             |                                           |
|                             |                                           |
|                             |                                           |
|-----------------------------+-------------------------------------------|








I see...you are attempting a compensation for the snapshot
requirements issue.

I would recommend stepping back and looking at the big picture,
afresh: avoid "digging a deeper hole" in this scenario. In
particular, a modern computer which has less than 5 GB of available
disk space is ridiculously in need of either housekeeping or disk
upgrade, where the latter can be internal, external peripheral, or
networked disk space - which is to say that there are many
opportunities. The client owner should consider that the running disk
may be of considerable age now, and may be worth replacing with a
much more capacious disk, which will avoid all the problems involved
should the old disk suddenly die - particularly as it sounds like
there is not a complete backup now for that disk. Or, the Windows
computer may be so old that it is worth wholly replacing. You are, in
effect, being mired in a problem which really belongs to the client
owner. If you find no cooperation there, consider pursuing
conventional Incremental backup, dealing with open files via retries
or software subsystem shutdown during the backup, depending upon
what's keeping them open.

   Richard Sims

On Nov 25, 2005, at 8:47 AM, Sandra wrote:

> Dear richard,
> I m alittle confused.
>
> I will create a .bat file which will take incremental backup of 1
> drive:
> dsmc -optfile=dsm.opt incremental -filesonly
>
> and the other .bat file would backup D drive:
> dsmc -optfile=dsm-d.opt incremental -filesonly
>
> I m doing this because i have less amount of HDD space 5GB on C and
> open files snapshot is taking tooo much space and then the system
> hangs.


######################################################################
The information contained in this e-mail and any subsequent 
correspondence is private and confidential and intended solely 
for the named recipient(s).  If you are not a named recipient, 
you must not copy, distribute, or disseminate the information, 
open any attachment, or take any action in reliance on it.  If you 
have received the e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete
the e-mail.  

Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the 
individual sender, unless otherwise stated.  Although this e-mail has 
been scanned for viruses you should rely on your own virus check, as 
the sender accepts no liability for any damage arising out of any bug 
or virus infection.
######################################################################

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>