Cameron,

I am experiencing extreme slowness for a Tivoli backup
on a Netware 6.5 SP2 server.

TSM Client 5.2.2
TSM  Server  5.3.1.4

We tried Swapping Tivoli patch cables and it did not make a difference.

Also tuning options in the dsm.opt file has not made a difference.

We are getting the following message also

ANR0482W Session 77993 for node DOCUSRS (NetWare)
                     terminated - idle for more than 180 minutes.
(SESSION:77993)

But there are backups that gets the above message also and they all finish
at a normal time. Also we have 5 other Novell Clients with the same dsm.opt
and client version and they complete at successfully at a normal time.
it is just this one backup that is extremely slow.








Cameron Ambrose wrote:

> Hello,
>
>       We're currently experiencing backup failures/extreme slowness on a
> Netware 6.5 SP2  server
>
>             TSM Client 5.3.0
>             TSM Server 5.2.0
>             TSA's up to date as recommended by Client Doco
>
>       Client Logs
>             10/05/2005 14:43:19 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing
> session reopen procedure.
>             10/05/2005 14:43:19 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing
> session reopen procedure.
>             10/05/2005 14:44:15 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to
> 'readRtn'.
>             10/05/2005 14:44:15 ANS1999E Incremental processing of 'SYS:'
> stopped.
>
>             10/05/2005 14:48:24 ANS1999E Incremental processing of 'INF:'
> stopped.
>
>             10/05/2005 14:48:25 ANS1017E Session rejected: TCP/IP
> connection failure
>
>       Server Logs
>
>             10/05/05   14:39:53      ANR0481W Session 2177 for node
> SERVERNAME (NetWare)
>                               terminated - client did not respond within
> 180 seconds.
>             10/05/05   14:41:10      ANR0406I Session 2178 started for node
> SERVERNAME
>                               (NetWare) (Tcp/Ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx(19578)).
>
>       Currently we have had a backup running for 24 hours and all that has
> been transfered is 4.19 gig and 255,000 files scanned. Has anyone else
> experienced similar issue's
>
>       Any help on this would be appreciated
>       Regards Cameron