Thanks for the reference information, Richard,,,,We had an IBM rep come in
and he said we could still use the 3494 library with 3592 tape drives, but
I wasn't sure about the tapes.
Debbie
Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
07/27/2005 08:34 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape Question
On Jul 27, 2005, at 8:17 AM, Debbie Bassler wrote:
> Currently, we have a 3494 tape library and 3590 tape drives and
> 3590 tapes.
> We are planning to get a couple of 3592 tape drives. My question
> is, will
> we be able to use the 3590 tapes in the 3592 tape drives? I would
> think
> since the capacity of the 3590 tapes is only 20G/40G it would not
> be a good
> idea to use them. Also, I'm not sure how the write speed would be
> effected
> if we use these tapes. I assume there are 3592 tapes which have a
> larger
> capacity and write speed.
Debbie -
Refer to the manual "IBM TotalStorage Enterprise Tape System 3592
Introduction and Planning Guide", where on page 5 it says:
"Model 3592 tape cartridges are not compatible with 3590 tape drives,
and, likewise, 3590 tapes cannot be used in the 3592 drives."
3592 is a technology departure, as 3590 was to 3490.
Another good reference is redpaper "IBM TotalStorage Enterprise Tape
3592: Presentation Guide";
and there is the "IBM TotalStorage Enterprise Tape Cartridge 3592"
brochure (G225-6987).
Richard Sims
|