ADSM-L

Re: Backup TSM database

2005-04-04 07:19:06
Subject: Re: Backup TSM database
From: nghiatd <nghiatd2 AT FPT.COM DOT VN>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:28:22 +0700
Can I use private tape if I incremental backup db. Not support backup db to
one tape is too waste


----- Original Message -----
From: "Hans-Dieter Kutz" <spambehaelter AT HDKUTZ DOT DE>
To: <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: Backup TSM database


> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:26:03AM +0200, goc wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "nghiatd" <nghiatd2 AT FPT.COM DOT VN>
> > To: <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 7:08 AM
> > Subject: Backup TSM database
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> > I backup TSM database by setting schedule with command : "backup db
> > type=full devclass=DLTCLASS1 DAA475 scratch=no". However, TSM always
mount a
> > new scratch tape to backup and doens't backup to volume DAA475.
> >
> > Doesn't TSM support backup database to one tape ?
> >
> > Nghiatd
> > ---------------------
> > hi,
> > AFAIK no, full DB backup goes always in scratch
> >
> > seeya
> Hmm,
> for me
> <snip>
> update libvol 3494LIB 000001 status=private
> update libvol 3494LIB 000002 status=private
> update libvol 3494LIB 000003 status=private
> update libvol 3494LIB 000004 status=private
> update libvol 3494LIB 000005 status=private
> update libvol 3494LIB 000006 status=private
> update libvol 3494LIB 000007 status=private
> backup db Devclass=3590devcl Type=Full Scratch=No -
> VOL=000001,000002,000003,000004,000005,000006,000007 wait=yes
> <snip>
>
> mfg.
> ku
>
> --
> Darth Vader:
> I sense something. A presence I've not felt since...
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>