ADSM-L

Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues resolved or not.

2005-03-16 17:36:27
Subject: Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues resolved or not.
From: "Thorneycroft, Doug" <dthorneycroft AT LACSD DOT ORG>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:35:35 -0800
Thanks Tim

Doug Thorneycroft
Systems Analyst
Computer Technology Section
County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
(562) 699-7411 Ext. 1058
FAX (562) 699-6756
dthorneycroft AT lacsd DOT org



-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Rushforth, Tim
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 2:31 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues
resolved or not.


It is fixed (somewhere around 5.1.5.2).

-----Original Message-----
From: Thorneycroft, Doug [mailto:dthorneycroft AT LACSD DOT ORG] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:25 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues resolved or
not.

OK, after spending a large portion of my day reviewing adsm-l post going
back to
2000, I'm still not sure. Does anyone know if there is still a
performance problem
running reclamation on a DIRMC random access disk pool?
I came across one post that said it was supposedly fixed, but
recommended using
a file type diskpool to be safe.