Re: Number of HBA's
2005-02-09 06:59:28
Stef Coene wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 21:10, Ben Bullock wrote:
The documents say you are supposed to NOT have SAN and tape
devices running on the same HBAs.
Mhh, can you point me to a paper stating this? I can't find any.
I can find the rule that a tape drive must be on a separate zone from the
disks. But it can still be the same HBA in the host.
Stef
Well what it really boils down to is the following two things:
1) Do you really want to slow disk access for tape traffic
and
2) Is it a supported configuration. I've been told flat out by IBM that
it is NOT a supported configuration. So as much as I would like to give
my TSM server some space on the SAN, I don't have room for another HBA
(x335) and I'm not about to go unsupported for it.
John
|
|
|