I thought that it was interesting too, that when I asked our Tivoli rep
and he bounced it up to licensing, the person there said: if you use
Intel Hyper-Threading, Windows reports having two processors even though
there is only one physical processor, and it is licensed as a single (1)
processor. ... That helps some in our shop.
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
TSM_User
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 6:06 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Does an inactive client need a licence
John,
I would contact your local Tivoli rep and pose this question to them.
Tivoli for a while now has been processor based for licensing. So if you
no longer have the TSM client installed and running on those servers
then it doesn't make sense that you should be paying maintenance or
anything for that matter for those nodes. This is one of the reasons
why they did away with the current license tracking in TSM at V5.3.
Another interesting point. If you were using something like VMWare and
had 4 clients on one physical dual processor server you would pay for a
single 2 processor license. Even though you have 4 installations of the
TSM client.
This can have a negative effect as well. If you have 4 VM's on an 8 way
and want to purchase the TDP for SQL for just one of the VM's you still
have to pay for the 8 process license of the TDP.
Of course pricing can be different from customer to customer and
location to location so really only your local Tivoli rep can tell you
exactly what you are required to do.
"Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM> wrote:
Hi John!
TSM's license counter starts counting as soon as a client starts backing
up.
A license is not returned until all the client's data has been removed
from
the server. So, as long as the inactive clients are storing data on your
TSM
server (no matter how old), you are using a license...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-----Original Message-----
From: John Naylor [mailto:John.Naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 11:08
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Does an inactive client need a licence
People,
My question is I have just run audit licence and it shows as audited the
number of registered clients
However a number of registered clients have not backed up for a few
months.
My question is do these inactive clients need a licence
Does anyone know IBM's official take on this.
thanks.,
John
**********************************************************************
The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern
Energy Group.
It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of
the error in transmission. Unless specifically stated otherwise, this
email
(or any attachments to it) is not an offer capable of acceptance or
acceptance of an offer and it does not form part of a binding
contractual
agreement.
Scottish Hydro-Electric, Southern Electric, SWALEC and S+S
are trading names of the Scottish and Southern Energy Group.
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If
you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail
or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any
other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly
prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by
error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete
this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its
subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect
or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor
responsible for any delay in receipt.
**********************************************************************
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
|
