Do you backup your database to the remote library? I take it you aren't
using DRM since you never need to take the tapes out of the library. If
you aren't using DRM, you have to manually delete your volume history for
DB backups. Could be it.

curtis.stewart AT lawson DOT com



"Miller, Ryan" <Miller.Ryan AT PRINCIPAL DOT COM>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
08/23/2004 12:51 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>


To
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc

Subject
Re: 2 3494 Tape libraries seem to have very different capacities. Any
ideas?






Is compression being used offsite & not onsite?

Ryan Miller

Principal Financial Group

Tivoli Certified Consultant
Tivoli Storage Manager v4.1


-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
John C Dury
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 12:27 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: 2 3494 Tape libraries seem to have very different capacities.
Any ideas?


      We have 2 3494 tape libraries. One is local and the other is remote.
The local one (3494LOCAL) receives all the data from the nightly backups
as
it gets migrated from disk. The remote one (3494REMOTE) is only used as
the
target of backing up the 3494LOCAL storage pool which gets done everyday
during the day. 3494LOCAL has 577 library volumes in it. 3494REMOTE has
494
library volumes in it. Both tape libraries only have 3590K tapes in them.
      My problem is that 3494LOCAL has 62 scratch tapes available and
3494REMOTE has 207 scratch tapes in it. Reclamation runs daily and sets
the
same percentage (57) for both libraries. How can there be such a huge
difference in the number of scratch tapes if both libraries should roughly
have the same amount of data? It's making me a little nervous that
3494REMOTE doesn't have the same data or something somewhere is going
wrong.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
John