ADSM-L

Re: Scratch mount failed

2004-08-20 11:15:05
Subject: Re: Scratch mount failed
From: Mark Bertrand <Mark.Bertrand AT USUNWIRED DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:12:07 -0500
Thanks Mike,

But that's not the issue. I failed to mention that the stuck/bad tape issue
is not a problem. I updated the volume, joined it to a tapepool and
destroyed the tape, system pulled in a new scratch and kept going. Again,
manual intervention. Someone has to type upd libv, why?

What's the deal? Why isn't this automated? Am I asking too much of TSM, I
mean how hard would it be to have the system recognize when this issue
arises. Simple if statement, if can't mount scratch volume goto next
available scratch.

Anyone?
Should I open a new PMR an put this on a wish list, or am I behind the times
and it's already been done?

Thanks,
Mark Bertrand


-----Original Message-----
From: Quiros, Mike [mailto:mike.quiros AT GOODRICH DOT COM]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 3:04 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Scratch mount failed


Just use the upd libv command to change the status from scratch to private.
TSM will skip that tape and go on to the next scratch tape.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Mark Bertrand
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:55 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Scratch mount failed

Over the last weekend we had a tape get stuck in a drive and threw the drive
offline, no big deal, right? This happens enough that we know how to deal
with it, but... this is the first time that this has happened (in my limited
three years experience) in that the stuck tape was a scratch tape. This
caused any job needing to mount a scratch tape to fail until manual
intervention. Let me tell you, this is not a good thing.

My question.., is this by design? If so who can we contact to get this
written in the next release? Why can't TSM recognize that the scratch tape
requested is not available and move to use another scratch, simple enough
right?

Storage Management Server for Windows - Version 5, Release 1, Level 6.3
Windows 2k
Library IBM  3584 w/ 6 lto1 fiber channel drives

Probably a setting that I missed in setup three years ago and just never had
this happen before, any help is appreciated as always.
Thanks,
Mark Bertrand

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>