ADSM-L

Re: Pre-Initialized Tapes - do they need to be labeled?

2004-07-26 07:04:34
Subject: Re: Pre-Initialized Tapes - do they need to be labeled?
From: "Bos, Karel" <Karel.Bos AT ATOSORIGIN DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:04:10 +0200
Hi,

Maybe a little off topic, but using AUTOlabel is also a fine method of reducing 
time spent on labeling libvols.

Regards,

Karel

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Bill Smoldt
Sent: maandag 26 juli 2004 03:15
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Pre-Initialized Tapes - do they need to be labeled?


I've talked with sites that ordered pre-labeled and got EBCDIC - make sure
they specify ANSI ASCII.

Bill Smoldt
STORServer, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Dave Canan
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 10:29 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Pre-Initialized Tapes - do they need to be labeled?

         I am throwing this out the list to get an answer. If you order
"pre-labeled" tapes to use with TSM, does this mean that they do not need
to go through the "label libv" process? This may seem like a silly
question, but we have a customer who want to order pre-labeled (and
barcoded) tapes, but I always thought that meant labeled for use by an MVS
system, not necessarily for use by a TSM system. They are ordering a large
batch of tapes, and if they don't have to be "labeled" with TSM, this could
save them a lot of time. Thanks for any answers to this.