ADSM-L

Re: Tsm restore

2004-07-09 09:45:34
Subject: Re: Tsm restore
From: "Smith, Rachel" <Rachel.Smith AT IRL.XEROX DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 14:41:18 +0100
Hi,

It will be from the command line, do you know they command?

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: 09 July 2004 14:22
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Tsm restore


Yes, you can do this with the TSM client GUI. You'll have to select all
three file systems from the GUI tree view, but they can be restored in a
single operation.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 07/09/2004
04:29:05:

> Hi,
>
> Within Veritas Netbackup you can perform a restore crossing mount
points,
> meaning each filesystem does not need to be restored individually.
> Example:
>
> You want to restore the following filesystems:
> /oracle
> /oracle/sapdata
> /oracle/sapbackup
>
> The command to run would be: restore /oracle -subdir=yes -inactive=yes
> This command would need to be run for each of the filesystems above.
Where
> with Veritas Netbackup you would select cross multiple mount points and
it
> would restore everything under /oracle (even if separate mount points).
>
> Hope this explains it!
>
> Thanks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of
Ted
> Byrne
> Sent: 09 July 2004 11:32
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Tsm restore
>
>
> >Can you tell me if there is an option within TSM to restore crossing
mount
> >points?
>
> Rachel,
>
> Can you clarify what you mean by "crossing mount points"?  An example of
> what you're trying to accomplish would be helpful.
>
> -Ted

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>