ADSM-L

Re: More TSM Linux issues

2004-06-25 10:08:40
Subject: Re: More TSM Linux issues
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:08:25 -0400
Thank you for the confirmation. I will proceed to update the drivers. My
kernel is not an issue. In fact, it is the opposite. I had to downlevel
the kernel to 9.0.1 since that was the highest level supported with
1.4.11. 1.4.14 supports the 9.0.3 kernel I am currently running.

Again, thanks !




"Mueller, Ken" <KMueller AT MCARTA DOT COM>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
06/25/2004 09:48 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>


To
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc

Subject
Re: More TSM Linux  issues






I had the same (or similar) problem using IBMtape 1.4.11, TSM would hit
EOV
then fail with an 'already reached EOV once' error, flag the tape R/O and
move on to the next tape ad nauseum... upgrading to IBMtape 1.4.14 solved
that problem (had to bump the Linux kernel up a notch to run a version the
new driver supported.)
-Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:zforray AT VCU DOT EDU]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 2:19 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: More TSM Linux issues


I think I have the answer to this, but would like someone to verify since
I
don't speak "hardware driver-ese".

On this TSM Linux server, the 3590 drives it uses (FC via QLOGIC), are
constantly "trashing" the tapes it writes to. Almost every tape is marked
as
"READONLY".

Upon investigation, I found a correlation. In the activity log, I see a
message about "end of file" being reached on the tape, followed by an
error

OP=FLUSH, Error Number=5, CC=0, KEY=40, ASC=00, ASCQ=00.

The IBMtape driver is at 1.4.11.  The only fixes since then (latest is
1.4.14) that might be close (this is where the "hardware driver-ese" comes
in) is:

"Fixed Write Filemark 0 handling at the early warning zone" ?

Your thoughts/suggestions on this ?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>