ADSM-L

Re: archive to tape ???

2004-03-02 01:37:06
Subject: Re: archive to tape ???
From: tsmadmin account for Excaliber Business Solutions <tsmadmin AT VODACOM.CO DOT ZA>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:36:41 +0200
Hi

Have you looked at the option of "generate backupset" and also look at the 
option of "define backupset"
It may help you with your requirement.

Thks
Sean

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael D Schleif [mailto:mds AT HELICES DOT ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 5:05 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: archive to tape ???


My client has an existing TSM setup that is quite different from the
textbook examples ;>

They are running TSM v5.1.5.4 on Windows 2000, and also have DRM.

Currently, they are keeping seven (7) versions for 150 days, and the
backups are going to a 6TB array.  That's right -- currently, there is
*no* tape involved.

In January, they bought an Overland LoaderXpress LTO-2 system, including
one (1) magazine with eleven (11) slots.  Can anybody comment on any
gotchas using this device with TSM?

The client says that they want to copy daily to tape only the most
recent version of files that have changed since previous day.

They will accept copy daily to tape all most recent file versions.

Each morning, those tapes last written will be taken offsite, and tapes
from seven (7) days ago brought back onsite and available.

Furthermore, there are two (2) offsite locations, one for Windows
platforms, and one for *NIX platforms.


I am thinking that this can be accomplished by _archiving_ from the
arrays to tape.  I am not clear how to specify policy.  Any ideas?

Their idea is, in the event of catastrophic failure at the current data
center, the offsite tapes will facilitate recovery at a remote site.
Everything is file based, including SQL Server dumps generated by DBA's.
The array is said to meet their onsite expectations, and they have
successfully recovered files from it during production.  As far as I
have determined, this client has never actually restored a whole machine
nor application.

Moreover, although they have DRM, previous consultants have left it
untouched, and implemented a plethora of scripts to facilitate disaster
recovery.  Unfortunately, the staff do not understand the scripts, and
have disabled all of them.

Please, consider this an invitation to comment, criticize, suggest
alternatives, &c.

What do you think?

-- 
Best Regards,

mds
mds resource
877.596.8237
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--
?This e-mail is sent on the Terms and Conditions that can be accessed by 
Clicking on this link http://www.vodacom.net/legal/email.asp "

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>