ADSM-L

Re: My journal blew up :(

2004-01-29 06:51:34
Subject: Re: My journal blew up :(
From: Pete Tanenhaus <tanenhau AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 06:51:03 -0500
>> TSM Client 4.2.3

This is a very old client and numerous Journal Based Backup problems
(including the NpPeek problem) have
been fixed in later releases.

I think you will have better luck if you upgrade to the latest 5.16x
client.



Pete Tanenhaus
Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development
email: tanenhau AT us.ibm DOT com
tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213

"Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it"

---------------------- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on 01/29/2004 
06:40 AM ---------------------------
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
Sent by:        "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:
Subject:        Re: My journal blew up :(



Sorry, it was noted in the previous posting:

Win2K Server (client)
TSM Client 4.2.3
Plenty of free space on both drives
Journal service allowed to grow as large as it needs to

Our setup:
TSM server 5.1.8.1
Solaris 8

Michael French
Savvis Communications
IDS01 Santa Clara, CA
(408)450-7812 -- desk
(408)239-9913 -- mobile



-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:33 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: My journal blew up :(


...
>01/14/2004 02:04:03 NpPeek: No data
...

When posting, please include your software levels.
You'll find prior postings on this in the List archives.  A summary is
provided in http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts to help our
community. If you search on "NpPeek" on the IBM web site, you will find
that an APAR has made a timing adjustment (which is why noting your
software level is important).

Richard Sims  http://people.bu.edu/rbs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>