ADSM-L

Re: RAW vs. JFS question

2004-01-22 19:36:43
Subject: Re: RAW vs. JFS question
From: Steve Harris <Steve_Harris AT HEALTH.QLD.GOV DOT AU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:35:36 +1000
Bill,

JFS journalling doesn't journal data changes, only changes to metadata.  So in 
a filesystem with lots of file and directory creates and deletes its useful.  
In the TSM situation, such changes are rare, and so JFS doesn't buy you a lot 
in terms of recoverability.

Steve

Steve Harris
AIX and TSM Admin
Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia

>>> bill.boyer AT VERIZON DOT NET 23/01/2004 0:38:54 >>>
The "new" TSM runing guide recommends using RAW volumes for performance
reasons. I have a client that doesn't want to go RAW because the JFS logging
goes away. I'm not that AIX savy to be able to argue one way or the other
with him...

Going RAW for performance, does that take away from recoverability in the
case of system crashes or filesystem problems?

Bill Boyer
"Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield." - ??



***********************************************************************************
This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the 
sole use of the intended recipients(s).  This confidentiality is not waived or 
lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is 
transmitted/received in error.

Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this 
email is prohibited.  It may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality 
if it relates to health service matters.

If you are not the intended recipients(s), or if you have received this e-mail 
in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone or by 
return e-mail.  You should also delete this e-mail message and destroy any hard 
copies produced.
***********************************************************************************

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>