Not sure of the price Diff, but we are in the midst of 3590 > 3592's and the 
3592's really rock.  We are seeing 169GB an hour for our 3590 - 3592 Move 
data's(faster from 3592 to 3592) and our Unix Data is seeing tape sizes from 
900Gb toi 1 TB.

M00022                       TAPE_APP_B-     3592TAPE       900,000.0       2.4 
    Filling 
                              ACKUP                                             
            
M00023                       TAPE_APP_B-     3592TAPE       900,000.0       3.6 
    Filling 
                              ACKUP                                             
            
M00025                       TAPE_DR_CO-     3592TAPE       900,000.0       2.5 
    Filling 
                              PY                                                
            
M00026                       TAPE_DR_CO-     3592TAPE       1,232,573      99.7 
      Full  
                              PY                                   .7           
            
M00027                       TAPE_BACKU-     3592TAPE       1,075,622      98.5 
      Full  


-----Original Message-----
From: Francois Chevallier [mailto:Francois.CHEVALLIER AT CCMX DOT FR]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:27 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: 3494


I have a 3494 with Magstar tapes 3590  and I would like to use a 3584 with
LTO tapes . What do you think about this choice (fiability,reliability..) .

Kind regards

François Chevallier
Parc Club du Moulin à Vent
33 av G Levy
69200 - Vénissieux
tél : 04 37 90 40 56