ADSM-L

Re: Client : MS Cluster active - active

2003-10-13 15:32:05
Subject: Re: Client : MS Cluster active - active
From: "Ochs, Duane" <Duane.Ochs AT QG DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:30:14 -0500
Each time it has happened both systems eventually were rebooted and had the
same results. 1) Blaster virus 2) security patches and 3) SP update.

It occured each time and I do not always get notified when our Intel servers
group performs these functions.

We do not have the two schedulers configured as cluster services, but TSM is
aware that they are a clustered system.

I reviewed the dsmsched.log to find that only 4 files were scanned and 4
were backed up. Out of 1.4 million.


Duane


-----Original Message-----
From: John Monahan [mailto:JMonahan AT COMPURES DOT COM]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:17 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Client : MS Cluster active - active


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 10/13/2003
09:44:48 AM:

> TSM Server 5.1.6.2 ( AIX)
> TSM Client 5.1.5.15 (W2K cluster)
>
> Cluster node a - Has drive f$
> Cluster node b - Has drive g$
>
> To apply patches to the systems, nodea f$ is failed to node b, patches
> applied to nodea and rebooted, f$ and g$ are failed to node a, Node b
then
> gets patch and rebooted then g$ is failed back to node b.
>
> At this point, backups can not be performed on either f$ or g$, only the
top
> level directories are backed up and no failures are indicated in the
Client
> log or the TSM server activity log.

Only top level directories are backed up on f: and g:?  How do you know
this?


> Each node has a scheduler, If I restart the schedulers the scheduled
backups
> run fine at next schedule.

What schedmode are you using?  Is your scheduler service defined in cluster
administrator?

What if you do a failover without doing the patches part, does the same
thing happen?