ADSM-L

Re: Difference between results actlog and summary

2003-08-13 12:40:21
Subject: Re: Difference between results actlog and summary
From: "Stapleton, Mark" <stapleto AT BERBEE DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:40:02 -0500
From: brian welsh [mailto:brianwelsh3 AT HOTMAIL DOT COM] 
> The result of a back-up schedule looks like this in the actlog:
> 08/12/03 06:01:52     ANE4952I (Session: 10317, Node: ABC)  
> Total number of
> objects inspected:  132,391
> 08/12/03 06:01:52     ANE4954I (Session: 10317, Node: ABCL)  
> Total number of
> objects backed up:    1,666
> 
> When I query the summary table I get the following results 
> for the back-up
> activity:
> START_TIME:     2003-08-12 05:30:03.000000
> END_TIME:       2003-08-12 06:01:54.000000
> ACTIVITY:                       BACKUP
> NUMBER:                         10317
> ENTITY:                         ABC
> COMMMETH:       Tcp/Ip
> ADDRESS:                        xxx.xx.xxx.xx:42581
> SCHEDULE_NAME:  xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> EXAMINED:       132
> AFFECTED:       1
> FAILED:                         0
> BYTES:          3008563568
> IDLE:           1902
> MEDIAW:                         0
> PROCESSES:      1
> SUCCESSFUL:     YES
> 
> Why shows the summary table examined 132 and the actlog 
> 132,391 inspected?
> The same is happening for affected and backed up!

This list has discussed this issue *repeatedly* over the last year or
so. Please consult the archives at http://search.adsm.org before posting
questions.

Summary results, particular in the TSM server version 4 range, are
notoriously unreliable.
 
--
Mark Stapleton (mark.stapleton AT berbee DOT com)
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627


 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>