ADSM-L

Re: Basic Question

2003-08-06 11:18:02
Subject: Re: Basic Question
From: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:17:37 -0600
Whoops....

> As I said before, switching management classes is not the correct
> solution. Remember, when you change a management class

Forgot to complete my thought....

When you change a management class, the next time the file is backed up,
*all* versions of that file will now be bound by the new management class
settings. And if you use INCLUDE to change the management class, *all*
versions of that file will be rebound to the new management class. Since
it is likely your retention settings for full backups are different than
those for daily incremental backups, manipulating management class
retention settings will not help.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.





Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
08/06/2003 08:09
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: Basic Question



Christian,

As I said before, switching management classes is not the correct
solution. Remember, when you change a management class

[snip]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>