ADSM-L

Re: Collocation from nocollocation

2003-08-05 06:13:13
Subject: Re: Collocation from nocollocation
From: "Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC" <Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:12:53 +0200
Hi,
we use here node level collocation. Filespace level would imply many many
tapes, even with a limited number of tapes/stg pool.

R. Lambelet, Nestec SA

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:bill.boyer AT VERIZON DOT NET]
Sent: Monday,4. August 2003 18:59
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Collocation from nocollocation


Actually there are 3 options:

No              None
Yes             At the NODE level
Filespace       At the FILESPACE level

Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Tudor,Troy,VEVEY,GL-IS/IT
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 12:31 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Collocation from nocollocation


I understood the only options for collocation were on or off

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Sims [mailto:rbs AT BU DOT EDU]
Sent: 30 July 2003 16:41
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Collocation from nocollocation


>With Collocation on, we had one small problem with the DB2 API.

What kind of Collocation?  Did you try both types?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>