Re: Collocation from nocollocation
2003-07-29 15:27:50
Other collocation considerations:
number of nodes in a storage pool mater and number of tape drives
matter - migration takes longer because you mount more tapes
if copy pool is not also collocated, reclaim take longer because more
onsite tapes have to be mounted to reclaim a given tape
if copy pool is collocated and nightly backups do not mostly fill a
tape per node, you will daily offsite reclaim as many tapes as you send
offsite
collocation make a TREMENDOUS difference in restore times of servers
(as opposed to individual files)
DR can be a real D if data is not collocated
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, William Rosette
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Kamp, Bruce
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, William Rosette
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Richard Sims
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Gill, Geoffrey L.
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Kamp, Bruce
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation,
David E Ehresman <=
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Steve Harris
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Tudor,Troy,VEVEY,GL-IS/IT
- Re: Collocation from nocollocation, Richard Sims
|
|
|