ADSM-L

FW: fiber attached 3590's for mksysb under AIX ?

2003-07-23 00:22:57
Subject: FW: fiber attached 3590's for mksysb under AIX ?
From: "Rane, Yashwant" <Yrane AT KOCKW DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 07:22:27 +0300
We have fibre attached 3590's attached to RS/6000 Model F80. We can cut mksysb 
on these drives but can not boot from this mksysb tape using fibre attached 
3590.

we are working with IBM H/W to make it work (as this is supported config.), but 
still no success.

Is there anybody tested booting using mksysb tape using fibre attached 3590?


Rane


-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth & Susan Bury [mailto:kbury AT CAROLINA.RR DOT COM]
Sent: Wed, July 23, 2003 3:04 AM
Subject: Re: fiber attached 3590's for mksysb under AIX ?


We tested the SCSI process that you described but did not carry it over to
fibre. However, there really isn't all that much difference in the way AIX
recognizes fibre drives verses SCSI drives. You shouldn't have any trouble
converting the SCSI process to fibre.

Ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]
> On Behalf Of Dwight Cook
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 07:44
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: fiber attached 3590's for mksysb under AIX ?
>
>
> Kind of off topic but it is protection of TSM servers...
>
> We are still running with all SCSI attached 3590's both B1A's
> and E1A's
>
> nice thing is you can use mtlib to mount a tape, then cut a
> "mksysb" to that drive & tape
>
> Two TSM environments require capacity increases and I'm
> wondering if that occurs with upgrades of B1A's to newer E's
> or H's, and if I go with fiber attached this time if the
> drives will still be valid devices to cut mksysb's to ? ? ?
>
> so are any TSM'ers with aix boxes & fiber attached drives
> doing this ? ? ?
>
> (it makes for a real slick automated monthly mksysb process
> to better protect your TSM environments)
>
> just wondering...
>
> Dwight
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>