ADSM-L

Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library

2003-07-11 14:48:06
Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library
From: "Coats, Jack" <Jack.Coats AT BANKSTERLING DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:49:33 -0500
I ran into this on my production system when we upgraded microcode and did
some library
expansion (added internal slots, expanded the door, and added drives).

You need to go into the library setup pannel and change it to use the
'extended' barcodes.
I had to pull all the tapes out of the library, and re-check them all in for
it to work,
but we only have a partially loaded 3583, not a big library.

After that it worked like a champ.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:stapleto AT BERBEE DOT COM]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:23 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library


The library you are using is reading the "extended" version of the LTO
barcode (the bit with the "L1" in it). You need to change the way the
library reads the barcode from "extended" to "normal".

P.S. This probably also means that your DR provider is not using the latest
microcode on the library.

--
Mark Stapleton


        -----Original Message-----
        From: Tom Kauffman [mailto:KauffmanT AT NIBCO DOT COM]
        Sent: Fri 7/11/2003 10:13 AM
        To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        Cc:
        Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library



        Mike --

        I've never seen this; no clues, unfortunately. Would these be the
"L1" code
        at the end of the barcode label?

        This is the point where I'd drag in the local D/R site support
people and
        also consider a call to Tivoli support.

        And, the way we run D/R tests here, we would set this issue up as a
primary
        objective for the next D/R test (a "Primary Objective" that we
cannot make
        work becomes a D/R test failure that shows up in a LARGE number of
reviews).

        Tom Kauffman
        NIBCO, Inc

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Michael Swinhoe [mailto:mike.swinhoe AT UK.ZURICH DOT COM]
        Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:50 AM
        To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        Subject: Re: Loading DR tapes into an automated library


        Tom,
             I can now check the tapes in but our barcodes are 6 digits and
when I
        checked the tapes in as scratch it has tagged 2 extra digits onto
the end.
        Do you know how to resolve this?

        Thanks,

        Mike.

        Regards,
        Michael Swinhoe
        Storage Management Group
        Zurich Financial Services
        E-mail:   mailto:Mike.Swinhoe AT UK.Zurich DOT com



                            Tom Kauffman
                            <KauffmanT@NI        To:
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
                            BCO.COM>             cc:
                            Sent by:             Subject:     Re: Loading DR
tapes
        into an automated library
                            "ADSM: Dist
                            Stor Manager"
                            <ADSM-L AT VM DOT MA
                            RIST.EDU>


                            11/07/2003
                            15:02
                            Please
                            respond to
                            "ADSM: Dist
                            Stor Manager"





        What do you mean "Refusing to read"?

        We did this earlier this year.

        Try this:

        1) Open the library
        2) Insert your tapes
        3) close the library
        4) wait for the initialization to finish
        5) Use the front-panel controls to query the library - should show
the
        number of tapes
        6) use the front panel controls to move a tape by volser and see if
you get
        a list of your tapes

        If #6 works, the library read your barcodes; if not, your D/R site
provider
        needs to investigate what's wrong.

        7) within TSM, "Audit library <libname> checklabel=barcode
        8) Checkin libv <libname> search=yes status=scratch
checklabel=barcode
        9) Checkin libv <libname> search=yes status=private
checklabel=barcode

        For 7 thru 9 to work, your library definitions need to be correct in
TSM,
        and I'm not sure how that works in a Win2K envirnment as our TSM
server is
        AIX.

        HTH --

        Tom Kauffman
        NIBCO, Inc

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Michael Swinhoe [mailto:mike.swinhoe AT UK.ZURICH DOT COM]
        Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:21 AM
        To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        Subject: Loading DR tapes into an automated library
        Importance: High


        Hi,
             I need help.  I am on the last day of DR and wanted to try
loading our
        LTO tapes into the automated LTO library, that the DR providers have
as we
        are sick of loading the tapes manually?  Anyway the library is
refusing to
        read our barcodes even though it is the exact same library we have
back at
        base.  I would be very grateful if someone can shine some light?

        TSM 5.1.5 (W2K)
        IBM LTO 3584
        8 * LTO 3580 drives
        IBM tapes.

        Cheers,

        Mike.

        Regards,
        Michael Swinhoe
        Storage Management Group
        E-mail:   mailto:Mike.Swinhoe AT UK.Zurich DOT com




-------------------------------------------------------------------------

        The information contained in this message is confidential and may be
        legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do
not
        read, copy or otherwise use it and do not disclose it to anyone
else.
        Please notify the sender of the delivery error and then delete the
        message from your system.

        Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the
author only.

        Communications will be monitored regularly to improve our service
and for
        security and regulatory purposes.

        Thank you for your assistance.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>