ADSM-L

Re: Is backup systemobject redundant on Win2K?

2003-06-27 06:22:00
Subject: Re: Is backup systemobject redundant on Win2K?
From: Remco Post <r.post AT SARA DOT NL>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:21:15 +0200
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 16:55:39 -0700
Joe Howell <jhowell_tsm AT YAHOO DOT COM> wrote:

> If I am doing an incremental backup of a Windows 2000 server client, is
> also performing a "backup systemobject" command redundant?  My reading of
> the TSM Client reference leads me to believe that it is but I could use
> some reassurance.
>
>

If you have the 'backup systemobjects' feature enabled (backup tab in the
prefs) you should have the registry backed-up during normal incremental
processing. On some servers I noticed we had to manually add the 'domain
systemobjects', since we don't backup all local filesystems and for some
reason the system objects are not included any more...


> Joe Howell
> Shelter Insurance Companies
> Columbia, MO

--
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post

SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdam    http://www.sara.nl
High Performance Computing  Tel. +31 20 592 8008    Fax. +31 20 668 3167

"I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer
industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry
didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas Adams

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>