ADSM-L

Re: Device Class

2003-06-25 13:39:38
Subject: Re: Device Class
From: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:39:13 -0400
I've never seen any reason to have different device classes for primary &
copy pools, assuming they are physically the same device type.


-----Original Message-----
From: Zosimo Noriega [mailto:znoriega AT ADNOC DOT COM]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:42 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Device Class


Hi to All,

What is the importance of using a different Device Class for onsite &
offsite storage pools?  Here in our site, we used single device class for
primary & copy pools.  Any feedback is really appreciated.  Thanks.

Zosi Noriega
Analyst, Data Storage
P.O. Box 898
ADNOC AUH UAE
009712 6024987

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>