At one point in time, the documentation actually explained that D01F was the
newer track for 3590 MC.  I don't know why it reverted back to the old
index.html page.  I'll look around for where that document went.  Maybe
someone from IBM can get the index updated. ;-)

bob

On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 09:18:48AM -0500, Steve Roder wrote:
> > >     With all the recent discussion here about I/O errors on tapes being
> > >the result of downleveled microcode, I went looking for the latest 3590E
> > >code, and all I could find was level 350, which we installed 15 months
> > >ago.  Can anyone point me at a download site for the newest code?  I tried
> > >ftp.software.ibm.com, but 350 was the latest, and service2.boulder.ibm.com
> > >has none at all, even though I got redirected there.
> >
> > Steve - The following seems to have the stuff:
> >
> >              ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/3590/code3590
>
> I guess my problem is two fold: the index.html file there is out-of-date,
> and not knowing/realizing that D0IF_26E.fmrz is newer than D0IE_350.fmrz,
> and that D0IF_26E.fmrz is for 3590E's.
>
> I think that was three things!
>
> Thanks Rich and Bob!
>
> Steve Roder, University at Buffalo
> HOD Service Coordinator
> VM Systems Programmer
> UNIX Systems Administrator (Solaris and AIX)
> TSM/ADSM Administrator
> (spr AT buffalo DOT edu | (716)645-3564)