On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:46:46 +0200
Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET> wrote:

> What's the point? I see nothing buggy here except DDSPOOL not in the
> storage hierarchy (which might be intentional).
>
> Zlatko Krastev
> IT Consultant
>
>
>

Which is intentional. I guess it's a feature of copy storagepools not to
have a next stg, so no, no bug...

>
>
>
> Remco Post <r.post AT SARA DOT NL>
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> 21.02.2003 17:20
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
>         To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>         cc:
>         Subject:        bug?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> tsm: COOKE>q stg
>
> Storage      Device       Estimated    Pct    Pct  High  Low  Next
> Stora- Pool Name    Class Name    Capacity   Util   Migr   Mig  Mig
> ge Pool
>                                (MB)                 Pct  Pct
> -----------  ----------  ----------  -----  -----  ----  ---
> ----------- ARCHIVEPOOL  DISK           2,000.0    0.0    0.0    90
> 70  FILEPOOL BACKUPPOOL   DISK           2,000.0   65.3   65.3    90
> 70  FILEPOOL DDSPOOL      TAPECLASS          0.0    0.0    0.0    90
> 70 FILECOPYPO-  FILEDEV      100,000.0    4.1
>  OL
> FILEPOOL     FILEDEV      100,000.0    4.6    6.0    90   70
> SPACEMGPOOL  DISK           2,000.0   50.4   50.4    90   70  FILEPOOL
>
>
> So this is our test-server, no biggy, but ehhh,this isn't supposed to
> work this way...
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
>
> Remco Post
>
> SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdam
> http://www.sara.nl
> High Performance Computing  Tel. +31 20 592 8008    Fax. +31 20 668
> 3167
>
> "I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the
> computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the
> computer industry
> didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas
> Adams