Re: summary-table
2003-02-07 08:53:36
From: Christoph Pilgram
> since installing the 4.2.3.2 level (after 4.1.4) on my AIX-server (AIX
> 4.3.3) I have the problem that in the summary-table the field
> "BYTES" for a backup-session of NT and W2K-clients is filled
> with "0" even though the client has transfered GigaBytes of
> data. Restore-sessions of the same client show a correct
> number of bytes in that field. Unix-Clients show (what I have
> seen) correct entries in that field.
As has been commented recently (and repeatedly in past months), the
summary table is a notoriously dubious source of information. *I*
wouldn't use it for any meaningful analysis.
--
Mark Stapleton (stapleton AT berbee DOT com)
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- summary-table, Christoph Pilgram
- Re: summary-table,
Stapleton, Mark <=
- Re: summary-table, Seay, Paul
- Re: summary-table, Allen Barth
- Re: summary-table, Seay, Paul
- Re: summary-table, Gill, Geoffrey L.
- Re: summary-table, Seay, Paul
|
|
|