ADSM-L

Re: Upgrade TSM Server from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.x.x

2003-01-21 13:11:52
Subject: Re: Upgrade TSM Server from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.x.x
From: Jane Bamberger <jane.bamberger AT BASSETT DOT ORG>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:07:52 -0500
Hi,

I have done both with no problems ( q nodes and update nodes) - could there
be another issue involved in the servers that have problems?

Jane
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Jane Bamberger
IS Department
Bassett Healthcare
607-547-4750
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)" <maadams AT DELOITTE DOT COM>
To: <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: Upgrade TSM Server from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.x.x


> Most Web client activities are ok.  But if you use the Web client to do
any
> type of upd node activity, it will bring down your TSM server.  We also
> stopped all queries against the nodes table because we found it caused
> issues as well.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matt
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jane Bamberger [mailto:jane.bamberger AT BASSETT DOT ORG]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:03 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Upgrade TSM Server from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.x.x
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded to 5.1.6 yesterday on an AIX 4.3.3 SP node and have had no
> problems with the web access at all - except for the formatting of the
> queries - the break commands seem to be left off of the reports. But I can
> query and change nodes with no problems. I have been running 24 hours - we
> have a 3494 Library and all backups, restores, reclamation, migrations and
> expiration have worked smoothly and flawlessly.
>
> Maybe I am not trying the correct action on the nodes table?
>
> Jane
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> Jane Bamberger
> IS Department
> Bassett Healthcare
> 607-547-4750
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joshua S. Bassi" <jbassi AT IHWY DOT COM>
> To: <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:43 AM
> Subject: Re: Upgrade TSM Server from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.x.x
>
>
> > There is a known defect with 5.1.6.  If you go through the web admin
> > and drill down to nodes, once you select a node it will crash the TSM
> > server.  I know this is present on the AIX & MVS servers.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Joshua S. Bassi
> > IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
> > Tivoli Certified Consultant -ADSM/TSM
> > eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
> >
> > AIX, HACMP, Storage, TSM Consultant
> > Cell (831) 595-3962
> > jbassi AT ihwy DOT com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf
> > Of Jane Bamberger
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:02 AM
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject: Re: Upgrade TSM Server from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.x.x
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just went to 5.1.6.0 with AIX 4.3.3 and IBM 3494 Tape library - so
> > far no problems at all.
> >
> > Jane
> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> > Jane Bamberger
> > IS Department
> > Bassett Healthcare
> > 607-547-4750
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "TSM Mailing List" <TSMMailingList AT MBCO DOT COM>
> > To: <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 1:36 PM
> > Subject: Upgrade TSM Server from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.x.x
> >
> >
> > > Hello all.  I am planning to finally upgrade my server to a 5.1
> > > level and was hoping someone could tell me which is the most stable
> > > version.
> >
> > > I have been pounding thru the list and have so far determined that
> > > 5.1.6.0 is bad news.  Is 5.1.5.4 a good version to upgrade to?  Is
> > > there anything I
> > should
> > > be aware of or to watch out for since I am coming from such an old
> > version?
> > > Can I go directly to 5.1.0.0 and than patch it or do I need to do
> > something
> > > with 4.2.x.x?
> > >
> > > If you could please answer my questions, I would be grateful.
> > >
> > > Thanks much
> > > Jay Volovsek
> > > Miller Brewing Company
> > >
> >
> - This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information
> intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by
aw.  -
> If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
> message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
>