ADSM-L

Re: OSX Mac Client Question

2003-01-14 03:26:59
Subject: Re: OSX Mac Client Question
From: Farren Minns <fminns AT WILEY.CO DOT UK>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:25:08 +0000
So, the Scheduler Daemon provided does not actually work?

This machine is actually a server in our secure comms room, so it's not a
big issue and I assume the manual scheduler does not add significant
overhead to the machine resources. It will do until they iron out all
problems I guess.

Thanks

Farren Minns - John Wiley & Sons Ltd



Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>

Sent by:        "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>

To:        ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:
Subject:        Re: OSX Mac Client Question


Yes, IBM does have a ways to go with the Tivoli Storage Manager client
for Mac OS X. It does work, and the last couple updates have taken care
of very critical problems. The major problem that remains is that the
Scheduler (which is the agent that communicates with the server and
facilitates scheduled backups) is an interactive application and cannot
run in the background. This means that you have to be logged in at the
console as an admin user in order for the Scheduler to work. If this is
the type of machine where there's only one or two admins, and you're
comfortable using something like a screensaver password to protect the
console, then TSM can work quite well. The reason for this issue is
that IBM essentially carbonized the old Mac OS version, keeping the
single user paradigm. The client is being completely rewritten by IBM,
and a version that has a scheduler capable of running as a background
process will be available this year.

Jim Sporer


At 04:00 PM 1/13/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>Hi TSMers
>
>I've just installed the latest client release for a Mac OSX machine. I can
>run backups/restores no problem and can run the scheduler manually. When I
>run the scheduler as a daemon though, the dsmsched.log file shows that the
>daemon contacted the server for the next schedule, but then it says
>'Scheduler stopped'. Is this correct? I would expect to see something like
>'Schedule will be refreshed in 1 hour'.
>
>Anyone out there have experience with the OSX clients?
>
>Thanks
>
>Farren Minns - John Wiley & Sons Ltd




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>