Re: Non IBM Libarary for TSM
2002-12-18 07:20:11
Hi
I'm not sure about the pricing but HP have good small libraries. I use an
old DLT7000 system that works great. Maybe look at some libraries and then
check the TSM site for compatibility.
Lawrie
-----Original Message-----
From: Raghu S [mailto:raghu AT COSMOS.DCMDS.CO DOT IN]
Sent: 18 December 2002 01:45
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Non IBM Libarary for TSM
Hi
I work on TSM soluion design. Most of the time i see customer unhappy with
the price of 3583 LTO.
( I stopped suggesting single drive libraries for TSM ). I found Magstar
3570 MP is a suitable one for medium sized corporates.I have no idea on Non
IBM libraries.Can anybody suggest me Non IBM libraries and corresponding
URLs ( Should work with TSM as efficient as IBM libraries and cheaper).
Thanks in advance
Regards
Raghu.
Richard Foster
<Richard.Foster@ To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
HYDRO.COM> cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: timeout value
for processes
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[email protected]
T.EDU>
12/18/2002 04:20
PM
Please respond
to "ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
The Mountwait parameter only specifies how long the process will wait for a
tape to be mounted after the process has been allocated the necessary
drive(s).
If I understand Henrik's question, there doesn't appear to be a parameter
which governs how long a process will wait for the tape drives to become
available.
We just run a script which cancels all Reclaim processes, whether they are
active, waiting for tape mounts or waiting for drives.
Richard Foster
Norsk Hydro
----------------------------
mountwait parameter in devclass definition
regds
Raghu
----------------------------
Hi all!
Is there a server option or a another why to specify for how long a process
will be active?
Example, If all drives are busy I might not want reclamation to be pending
for hours until two drive becomes available.
Henrik.Wahlstedt
|
|
|