ADSM-L

Re: Non IBM Libarary for TSM

2002-12-18 07:20:11
Subject: Re: Non IBM Libarary for TSM
From: Lawrie Scott - Persetel Q Vector <LawrieS AT COMPAREXAFRICA.CO DOT ZA>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:57:38 +0200
Hi

I'm not sure about the pricing but HP have good small libraries. I use an
old DLT7000 system that works great. Maybe look at some libraries and then
check the TSM site for compatibility.

Lawrie

-----Original Message-----
From: Raghu S [mailto:raghu AT COSMOS.DCMDS.CO DOT IN]
Sent: 18 December 2002 01:45
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Non IBM Libarary for TSM


Hi

I work on TSM soluion design. Most of the time i see customer unhappy with
the price of 3583 LTO.
( I stopped suggesting single drive libraries for TSM ). I found Magstar
3570 MP is a suitable one for medium sized corporates.I have no idea on Non
IBM libraries.Can anybody suggest me Non IBM libraries and corresponding
URLs ( Should work with TSM as efficient as IBM libraries and cheaper).

Thanks in advance

Regards

Raghu.



                    Richard Foster
                    <Richard.Foster@        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
                    HYDRO.COM>              cc:
                    Sent by: "ADSM:         Subject:     Re: timeout value
for processes
                    Dist Stor
                    Manager"
                    <[email protected]
                    T.EDU>


                    12/18/2002 04:20
                    PM
                    Please respond
                    to "ADSM: Dist
                    Stor Manager"





The Mountwait parameter only specifies how long the process will wait for a
tape to be mounted after the process has been allocated the necessary
drive(s).

If I understand Henrik's question, there doesn't appear to be a parameter
which governs how long a process will wait for the tape drives to become
available.

We just run a script which cancels all Reclaim processes, whether they are
active, waiting for tape mounts or waiting for drives.

Richard Foster
Norsk Hydro

----------------------------
mountwait parameter in devclass definition

regds
Raghu

----------------------------
Hi all!

Is there a server option or a another why to specify for how long a process
will be active?

Example, If all drives are busy I might not want reclamation to be pending
for hours until two drive becomes available.

Henrik.Wahlstedt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>