ADSM-L

Re: Error in 3583

2002-10-25 08:51:32
Subject: Re: Error in 3583
From: "Hooft, Jeroen" <Jeroen.Hooft AT ATOSORIGIN DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:49:50 +0200
Lars

I had this once on a 3584 when there were used slots replaced for a tape
drive.
I had to fix it by removing the drives and library from TSM. After a
redefinition of the library and drives I could checkin all tapes again.

Jeroen

10/04/2002 16:47:39  ANR9999D mmsscsi.c(6431): ThreadId<21> Invalid home
slot
                      address in inventory for library
                      XXXXXX; vol=CHE044L1, slot=1141.
10/04/2002 16:47:39  ANR9999D mmsscsi.c(6289): ThreadId<21> Unable to build
                     active slot records for library
                      XXXXXX.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lars Bebensee [mailto:LBebensee AT HAITEC DOT DE] 
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 2:14 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Error in 3583


Hi guys and girls,

on of my customers encounters an error on his 3583 library:

10/25/2002 11:56:18   ANR8478W Invalid home slot address in inventory for
                       library LB6.0.0.3;  volume = BHS001L1;slot = 4133.
10/25/2002 11:56:18   ANR9999D mmsscsi.c(6834): ThreadId<33> Unable to
build
                       active slot records for library LB6.0.0.3.

using TSM 5.1 on Windows. He was running an Audit Library (audit libr
LB6.0.0.3 checklabel=yes) which actually produced the above error and fails
to complete. Even when removing the mentioned tape from the library the
still error occurs.
He also sent me an extract from the error entries via RMU that read like:

10/22/02 20:41:12 C=0 I=0 - ST C_ehinit_EH_Initialized  [0000]
10/22/02 19:00:13 C=0 I=0 - HP C_msmain_servo_off       [0004]
10/22/02 18:21:10 C=0 I=0 - ST C_ehinit_EH_Initialized  [0000]
10/22/02 17:51:33 C=0 I=0 - ST C_ehinit_EH_Initialized  [0000]
10/22/02 17:02:27 C=0 I=0 - ST C_wfscsst_ca_notify_failed    [0001]
.
.
.
goes on like this for several times per day

Did anyone see this kind of behaviour before? Any ideas what to do, since
the "Audit Library" fails??

Thanks Lars

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Error in 3583, Lars Bebensee
    • Re: Error in 3583, Hooft, Jeroen <=