ADSM-L

More on Repeat Backups...

2002-10-16 07:48:48
Subject: More on Repeat Backups...
From: "Lawson, Jerry W (ETSD, IT)" <jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 07:47:46 -0400
Date:           October 16, 2002                        Time: 7:31 AM
From:   Jerry Lawson
                The Hartford Insurance Group
860     547-2960                jlawson AT thehartford DOT com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
First - let me thank you all for the responses to my original question.
Your answers have gotten me thinking some - I say some, because at my age,
it's hard to get everything going again, and I suffer from "senior moments"
too often.

Most of the answers revolved around the suggestion that I could exclude
something - either the files themselves, or the System Object itself if I
get the newest client.  This seems to me to be treating the symptom, rather
than the problem - if I exclude them, obviously, I can never restore them
(DUH!).  If these do get corrupted or deleted, it would appear that I could
be in for another bout with my desktop support folks - they just had my
Laptop for 3 weeks - I'm not eager to deal with them again.  Now I will be
the first to admit that I'm not MS Certified on any OS, and so the idea of
excluding the whole System Object is scary as well - doesn't that include a
big portion of registry information if I need to do a complete restore?  Or
is the idea of a Bare Metal restore with TSM one that has died?

In my (sometimes overly simplistic) mind, I remember the ADSM class I
attended where the instructor identified how a file was determined to have
changed - either the date, the time, or the size has changed.  Has TSM
changed this philosophy?  After all, I look at the files in question, and
nothing has changed that I can see externally.  Shouldn't there be a better
approach than to say "well, they're a part of the system object, and
therefore you need to exclude them."  Shouldn't the software be smart enough
to figure this out?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
                                                     Jerry (still tilting at
windmills)



This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying,
disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately by return email and delete this communication and destroy all 
copies.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>