Re: baffling tape, 3584 HW compression, and stgpool design
2002-09-04 06:30:09
Hot Diggety! David Longo was rumored to have written:
> For question 2, on my 3584 drives I have the FORMAT=ULTRIUMC and
> it uses comperssion. I'm getting about 275GB average on my tapes
> (IBM tapes), have gotten nearly 400GB on some!
Niiice! Sounds like bulk of data must be ASCII or something easily
compressible with repeatable data.
Thanks, using FORMAT=ULTRIUMC and it now indicates use of hardware
compression.
-Dan
|
Previous by Date: |
Another Audit DB question, Farren Minns |
Next by Date: |
Re: baffling tape, 3584 HW compression, and stgpool design, Dan Foster |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: baffling tape, 3584 HW compression, and stgpool design, Dan Foster |
Next by Thread: |
Re: baffling tape, 3584 HW compression, and stgpool design, Dan Foster |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|