ADSM-L

Re: Web Admin Interface - grrr

2002-08-23 07:11:22
Subject: Re: Web Admin Interface - grrr
From: "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:34:58 +0200
I'm sorry... I don't like paying extra for something that should be a
standard part of the product: a decent administrative interface.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Paschal [mailto:AlexPaschal AT FREIGHTLINER DOT COM]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 19:49
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Web Admin Interface - grrr


What kind of market is there for a working, currently supported GUI?
Basically, if you all banded together, could you commission somebody to
recreate and keep up a new Admin GUI that's relevant to the current version
of TSM, that doesn't have the weaknesses of the Web interface?

Or maybe somebody like Lindsay Morris (who already has a development group
familiar with TSM) can develop a Admin GUI product fairly easily?  Do you
think there are enough GUI users who
a) Are willing to pay for a license for this GUI?
b) Are willing to pay some sort of maintenance cost to keep it current?

Alex


**********************************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), 
its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or 
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
any delay in receipt.
**********************************************************************

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>