Re: diskpool performance
2002-07-28 21:51:59
There is one caveat Mark.
If the loss of a backup is a critical failure to an application, then you
must Raid-1 or Raid-5 the pool. I have applications that take processing
cycle backups several times throughout their processing cycle. I also have
servers that have to have the same backup cycle. So, an unprotected
diskpool is not a black or white answer to solving a performance problem.
However, you are correct, RAID-5 is going to perform like crap for disk
pools unless you have ESS disk which have a very large disk cache on the
front and the RAID-5 turns into RAID-3 (no reads before writes because it is
always a full stripe write).
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: diskpool performance, (continued)
- Re: diskpool performance, Orville Lantto
- Re: diskpool performance, Pearson, Dave
- Re: diskpool performance, Tab Trepagnier
- Re: diskpool performance, Orville Lantto
- Re: diskpool performance, Seay, Paul
- Re: diskpool performance, Alex Paschal
- Re: diskpool performance, Seay, Paul
- Re: diskpool performance,
Seay, Paul <=
- Re: diskpool performance, Roger Deschner
- Re: diskpool performance, Salak Juraj
|
|
|