Re: Slow Reclamation - And a need for speed...
2002-06-11 16:33:43
Subject: |
Re: Slow Reclamation - And a need for speed... |
From: |
asr AT UFL DOT EDU |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:31:22 -0400 |
=> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:33:48 -0500, "Coats, Jack" <Jack.Coats AT
BANKSTERLING DOT COM> said:
> Our current schedule is:
> Weekdays 1300 till 2000 - update stgpool COPYPOOL rec=20
> Weekdays 0900 till 1300 - update stgpool TAPEPOOL rec=10
> Saturday 0800 till 2000 - update stgpool TAPEPOOL rec=10
> Sunday 0800 till 2200 - update stgpool COPYPOOL rec=20
> Would it be a good idea to up the recovery percent?
I'd say, not just "yes", but "hell yes".
The lowest my reclaim percentage ever gets is about 50. Think about the
trade-offs:
If you reclaim percentage is 50, then your long-term average "wasted space" is
about 25%. but this doesn't mean your costs have grown this much.
You've increased the total cost of your tape infrastructure by something like
5%. Say you've got a 3494: you still only need one control unit (L frame),
one set of "smarts". The rest is just extra storage slots.
What's worse: If you've got your reclaim percentages as low as 10%, you are
going to be moving a -lot- more data. While you're saving money by reducing
your tape-slot count, you're also spending tape-hours. Not just wear-and-tear
on the drives themselves (though that's possibly an issue) but actual
number-of-hours-in-a-day. As soon as you're ready to buy your next tape
drive, think about the cost tradeoff, using more tapes to save drive time.
Allen S. Rout
|
|
|