Re: Client Option Sets
2002-04-10 20:43:19
I have placed all my include/exclude/exclude.archive all in the same dsm.opt
file and I have had no problems with any of my clients even if the
directory/file does not exist.
Server 4.2.1.12 (Windows)
Clients 4.2.1.20
Joe
(or am I reading the message wrong?)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:xjolliff AT TI DOT COM]
Sent: Wed 4/10/2002 3:45 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Cc:
Subject: Re: Client Option Sets
I suspect we mean the same thing, I just don't write in my native tongue
very well --
Multiple client options sets where you define exclusions for specific
things:
One set with inclexcl for WINNT4 clients, a set with inclexcl for
Oracle,
one for MSSQL and if you had a WNNT server with Oracle, you just
specify the
WINNT and the Oracle for the client.
I'm one of those sorts that likes to keep administration as simple as
possible - only one place to look at the lists rather than 1500 dsm.opt
files as we do at this location now.
Just my thoughts with the wish that IBM/Tivoli is listening ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: Pétur Eyþórsson [mailto:peddi AT ITN DOT IS]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:27 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Client Option Sets
Yes i agree with you Dale.
although i don´t see it like that
I would like to see a hierarchy in Client Option Sets. One Mother Client
option for all, and then you can define it longer and in more details
down
the road.
Kvedja/Regards
Petur Eythorsson
Taeknimadur/Technician
IBM Certified Specialist - AIX
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified Professional
Microsoft Certified System Engineer
peddi AT itn DOT is
Nyherji Hf Simi TEL: +354-569-7700
Borgartun 37 105 Iceland
URL: http://www.nyherji.is
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On
Behalf Of
Jolliff, Dale
Sent: 10. apríl 2002 13:44
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Client Option Sets
Is it just me, or would anyone else like to see the ability to attach
multiple client option sets to a node?
Why would it not be a good idea to be able to do this?
|
|
|