Re: Point in Time Backups
2015-10-04 17:10:42
Dave,
I am puzzled, but willing to learn--Why do you say that backupsets
and archiving are not viable ways of doing PIT backups? Backupsets
are more oriented to a PIT restore, but they do provide a snapshot
of what the active files are at a given time. And archives seem
like the arch-typical PIT snapshot to me.
Kai
>Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:06:20 -0000
>From: "Frost, Dave" <dave.frost AT GUARDIANIT DOT COM>
>Subject: Re: Point in Time Backups
>
>Cheri
>This is our biggest headache with TSM which has NO suitable facility to
>provide what you want. Backupsets and archiving are not viable ways of
doing
>it.
>
<snip>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: Point in Time Backups, (continued)
- Re: Point in Time Backups, Cheri Howard
- Re: Point in Time Backups, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: Point in Time Backups, Kai Hintze
- Re: Point in Time Backups, Ochs, Duane
- Re: Point in Time Backups, Nicholas Cassimatis
- Re: Point in Time Backups, Steve Harris
- Re: Point in Time Backups, Tab Trepagnier
- Point in Time Backups, Cheri Howard [mailto:Cheri_Howard
- Re: Point in Time Backups, Frost , Dave [mailto:dave.frost
- Re: Point in Time Backups, Salak Juraj [SMTP:j.salak
- Re: Point in Time Backups,
Kai Hintze [mailto:kai_hintze <=
|
|
|