ADSM-L

Re: A Question to IBM NSM Customers

2002-03-07 09:57:41
Subject: Re: A Question to IBM NSM Customers
From: Dale Jolliff <dale.jolliff.b AT BAYER DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 09:54:33 -0500
I found that moving the DB volumes off JFS to raw logical improved our
performance tremendously - our full DB backups took less than half the previous
time to complete.  It was a small system though, one L32  cabinet and a single
frame LTO SCSI attached.

Unfortuneately, I haven't had the opportunity to be in an environment to compare
different server hardware on the TSM server performance...
Is the NSM the only IBM box you have?







                      "Sutch, Ian
                      (London)"                 To:       ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST 
DOT EDU
                      <SutchIan@EXCHANGE        cc:
                      .UK.ML.COM>               Subject:  Re: A Question to IBM 
NSM Customers
                      Sent by: "ADSM:
                      Dist Stor Manager"
                      <[email protected].
                      EDU>


                      03/07/2002 08:50
                      AM
                      Please respond to
                      "ADSM: Dist Stor
                      Manager"






Dale,

Thanks for the info. Its good to know we are not alone!

We too have serious performance issues with the NSM'S and are also
frustrated by their lack of scalability.
We also have Sun TSM Servers using raw logical volumes that fly along
by comparison, we will go forward with TSM on Solaris as the platform of
choice.

Thanks for your response

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dale Jolliff
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:38 PM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: A Question to IBM NSM Customers
>
> I had an NSM setup - we had performance issues that forced us to use raw
> logical
> volumes for storage and db, and that breaks the "supported"
> configuration.
> (try dealing with the NSM bunch in that situation!)
> I simply dealt with the OS and TSM support teams separately - calling into
> the
> NSM support line was always a drawn out affair, and usually got me routed
> to one
> of the two groups anyway.
> Just my 2 pennies worth...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                       "Sutch, Ian
>                       (London)"                 To:
> ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>                       <SutchIan@EXCHANGE        cc:
>                       .UK.ML.COM>               Subject:  A Question to
> IBM NSM Customers
>                       Sent by: "ADSM:
>                       Dist Stor Manager"
>                       <[email protected].
>                       EDU>
>
>
>                       03/07/2002 06:50
>                       AM
>                       Please respond to
>                       "ADSM: Dist Stor
>                       Manager"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I would be interested in hearing from any Users/Organisations that utilise
> IBM 3466 NSM's
> and struggle to navigate through the necessary IBM support Teams.
>
> As a user of NSM's I would expect, when raising a pmr, to have a single
> point of ownership
> of the problem, be it OS, hardware or TSM related.
> It has been common practice to be passed to one team who may say that the
> fault cannot be resolved by their
> team and thensuggest we raise another pmr with a different team!! Very
> frustrating
>
> I would be very interested to hear form anyone who has the same problem or
> has managed to find a solution.
>
> Many thanks
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>