Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS
2002-02-22 08:58:02
It sounds like you must run a Windows based system. What server config are you
running, how many clients and what kind of data transfer rates are you getting?
We are thinking risc because of the stability and increased throughput over
Windows and possible SAN in the next couple of years.
>>> MRemeta AT SELIGMANDATA DOT COM 02/21 3:01 PM >>>
Why a 'RISC based server system' Mark? You could handle that number of
clients easily with a low end Windows server.
Mark
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Mark Morrison
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, David Longo
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Mark Morrison
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Malbrough, Demetrius
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Seay, Paul
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Remeta, Mark
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS,
Mark Morrison <=
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, John Naylor
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Mark Morrison
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Remeta, Mark
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Remeta, Mark
- RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Mark Morrison [mailto:MORRISM1
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, SBCSI
- RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Mark Morrison [mailto:MORRISM1
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
|
|
|