Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????
2002-02-13 09:32:15
Subject: |
Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ???? |
From: |
Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM> |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:29:43 -0500 |
Are you sure the user actually logged off vs. locked the keyboard?
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
Keith Kwiatek <kkwiatek AT NIST DOT GOV>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
02/13/2002 07:00
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:
Subject: Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat
????
Hi Wanda,
hmmm... I hear what you are saying, but we have a situation where a good
portion of our 600 windows TSM clients can't backup the ntuser.dat, and
sometimes the usrclass.dat, files even if the user IS logged off.... We
have
performed numerous trials on this, and it seems that windows sometimes
maintains the lock on these files even if the user is logged off.
We search the actlog each morning for messages like the one below, and
then
send an email to the user, which makes the user puzzled, which results in
additional work for us... :
2002-02-12 09:44:03.000000 LIGHTBUG.NI.COM ANE4987E Error processing
'\\ightning\c$\Documents and Settings\gooney \NTUSER.DAT': the object is
in
use by another process
Keith Kwiatek
National Institute of Standards and Technology
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Keith Kwiatek
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Rushforth, Tim
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????,
Andrew Raibeck <=
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Prather, Wanda
- Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Keith Kwiatek [mailto:kkwiatek
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Andrew Raibeck [mailto:storman
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Andrew Raibeck [mailto:storman
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Rushforth , Tim [mailto:TRushfor
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Keith Kwiatek [mailto:kkwiatek
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Test Restore on Exchange., Bill Smoldt |
Next by Date: |
Re: Used to Be PC Magazine Article, morphed to NT/Novell BMR Proc edure, Martin, Jon R. |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Prather, Wanda |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Is it ok to exclude ntuser.dat, and usrclass.dat ????, Prather, Wanda |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|