Hi Tivoli has two oem partners constructing HSM clients for Netware, Windows NT/2000. OTG has the clients for NT/2000. I'm using these and they are working perfectly. Knozall has the client for Netware 4X/5X. I'm using these clients also, and I haven't had any problems. Best Regards Daniel Sparrman ----------------------------------- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Bergkällavägen 31D 192 79 SOLLENTUNA Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 TAZ <switchback60 AT HOTMAIL DOT COM> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> 2001-12-23 09:39 MST Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU cc: bcc: Subject: Re: backup/recovery
HSM is a viable option.
Tivoli only has the 2 HSM clients Sun and AIX.
Sam.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Anderson F. Nobre" <anderson AT SOLVO.COM DOT BR> To: <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 6:09 PM Subject: backup/recovery
Hi,
I have some doubt about how to improve the recovery time of a fileserver. I mean a fileserver with 300GB I spend 4 hour to backup. But to recover it from scratch takes about 24 hours. I was thinking in use backupsets, but in my opinion I just transfering the problem from client to server. So I would spend 24 hours to generate a backupset to this node. The reasons for the recovery is so slow compared to backup I understand that the first reason is because I always do incremental backup, the second it4s because I use multithreading on client and when I do the recovery is always one session. The other reason is the fragmentation of the files on the tape, even using colocation=yes. I4ve already created a mgmtclass to make the backup of directories on a disk stgpool. Anyone have any sugestion on how to increase the speed of restore?
Regards,
Anderson
|