ADSM-L

Re: BMR for Win2k: Use of NTBACKUP

2001-11-20 20:07:48
Subject: Re: BMR for Win2k: Use of NTBACKUP
From: Ray Schafer <schafer AT TKG DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 19:05:15 -0600
Michael Bartl wrote:

In a standard Win2k environment bare metal recovery using TSM doesn't
work. Of course, the Kernel Group BMR is a great tool, but expensive.

I think if you take into consideration all of the costs, TKG's BMR gives
a return on investment rather quickly.  With this solution, after the
initial installation, there is nothing to do except run your incremental
backups the way you do now.   All of the point solutions you have to
perform Bare Metal Restores are no longer needed.  No more local tape
drives or monitoring the processes, no more administrators time tracking
the backups, dealing with the media, wondering if you remembered
everything.  And we're not even talking about the time saved when you
actually have to use it for a Bare Metal Restore.   It is automated in
both daily operations and during the restoration.  That's where the
value comes in.

Weigh the entire solution: what it costs you before you implement BMR
and after.  Most companies get back their investment within the first 6
months of use.

--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
This message contains information which may be confidential
This message contains information which may be confidential
and privileged.  Unless you are the addressee (or authorized
to receive messages for addressee), you may not use, copy or
disclose to anyone the message or any information contained
in the message.  If you have received this message in error,
please advise the sender by reply email and delete the
message.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
--
Ray Schafer             The Kernel Group       www.tkg.com
Ray Schafer             The Kernel Group       www.tkg.com
Sr. Sales Engineer      schafer AT tkg DOT com    +1 512 433 3300
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>