ADSM-L

Re: IBM 3494

2001-09-06 11:44:05
Subject: Re: IBM 3494
From: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT MAIL.TJU DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:44:52 -0400
Quoting "Cook, Dwight E" <cookde AT BP DOT COM>:

> Are you on a ship ?

His telephone area code indicates that he is in California. I have
seen pictures of household water heaters that fell over during
earthquakes in California. Some types of computer equipment are as
tall in proportion to their width as a water heater, so there is real
reason for concern about equipment falling over during an earthquake.
I am not sure a blanket policy of bolting down equipment is warranted.
A 3494 is nearly as wide as it is tall.

> If this is to mainly keep the equipment from walking off (like a 3494
> would)
> I would just do the following...
> Remember you have to be real careful not to screw up the alignment when
> you
> attempt to "bolt it down"

My edition of the "Magstar 3494 Tape Library Introduction and Planning
Guide" (GA32-0279-08) has about half a page of discussion of earthquake
effects (listed under "Earthquake" in the index). This material seems
to be arguing against the idea of a rigid attachment to building
structure. Instead, it recommends flexible restraints that will
decouple the 3494 from the earthquake energy.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>