ADSM-L

Re: thoughts on 4.1 server vs. 4.2 server?

2001-08-10 11:29:24
Subject: Re: thoughts on 4.1 server vs. 4.2 server?
From: Othonas Xixis <othonas AT BELLSOUTH DOT NET>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:29:15 -0400
Lisa,
the version that you need to be on for at least a couple more months is:
4.1.4.1 .

Cheers.

Othonas
336.253.5697

Lisa Cabanas wrote:

> Hello, *SMers
>
> We will be purchasing TSM (again) shortly, and wondered if/how many are
> using the 4.2 server.  We have 12 TSM servers & all but one are at
> 3.7.4.5, the other one is at 4.1.3.0.  We will also be purchasing 12 M80s
> to replace the 10 J40s and 2 winterhawks (and another 6-drive 3494 and
> ditching 10 3575s).  The software will be here before the hardware will
> be, so we would like to take care of all the things *SM before rolling to
> new hardware.
>
> We don't have a test environment to play any of this out... everything we
> do will be to live, production TSM servers (yes, ye-haw!).  It would save
> us time and steps if we could just go up to 4.2 on all the server versions
> (all clients work with a 4.2 server)-- but only if it is relatively
> stable.  I know there is a new maintenance level for 4.2 out, so that
> makes me feel a little more confident than going to straight-base-level
> code.
>
> How many of you are at 4.2, was it painful, and is it stable?  Or, should
> I just go to 4.1.4.0 and wait for the stability in 4.2-- after I have
> moved over to the new hardware?
>
> thanks in advance!
>
> lisa
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>