Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine

Subject:	Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine
From:	Lindsay Morris <lmorris AT SERVERGRAPH DOT COM>
Date:	Wed, 9 May 2001 12:12:49 -0400

I asked the same wuestion a couple of years ago.
Under older versions of TSM, you didn't want the database to get too large.

On mainframes, it was so you could use multiple virtual machines - something
maybe to do with the TCP/IP bottleneck under older MVS.

Nowadays I don't see why.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Robert_K_Miller/Lancaster/Corporate/Armstrong* *Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Lindsay Morris* <= *Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Paul Zarnowski* *Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Joe Faracchio* *Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Richard L. Rhodes* Message not available *Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Jim Sporer* *Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Lindsay Morris* *Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Jeff Bach* *Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Lindsay Morris* *Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, bbullock* *Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Alex Paschal* *Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.*

Previous by Date:	ANR9999D, Fred Johanson
Next by Date:	*Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Jeff Bach*
Previous by Thread:	*Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Robert_K_Miller/Lancaster/Corporate/Armstrong*
Next by Thread:	*Re: Multiple TSM Servers On Same Machine*, Paul Zarnowski*
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]