ADSM-L

Re: AIX Server - What's Stable?

2001-03-30 14:18:51
Subject: Re: AIX Server - What's Stable?
From: "Walker, Thomas" <Thomas.Walker AT EMICAP DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:18:16 -0500
Tivoli claims that with v4.1.2 they've tried a new archiving sceme. If you'd
like to use the old scheme, you must specify -v2archive when running the
client (dsmc -v2archive for AIX for example). The one caveat, is that this
option is only supported in the 4.1.2 client code. We're pretty much
steaming about this right now. I shouldv'e stuck with 3.7.2 If it's not
broke, they don't upgrade!

-
Tom Walker
Tom Walker


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pearson, Dave [mailto:DCPearson AT SNOPUD DOT COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 10:55 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: AIX Server - What's Stable?
>
>
> They don't have a fix for the problem with the archives
> problem yet.  So we
> are staying on 4.1.0.  I will be upgrading to 4.1.2 on our
> test server for
> TSM to test it out and send some info to Tivoli Support if
> the problem still
> exist.
>
> Dave Pearson
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Walker, Thomas [SMTP:Thomas.Walker AT EMICAP DOT COM]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 5:50 AM
> > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject:      Re: AIX Server - What's Stable?
> >
> > I spoke with Tivoli yesterday. They recommend going to
> 4.1.3 Has anyone
> > done
> > that? Have the archives become more reasonable? Ours were
> taking nearly 3
> > DAYS to complete!! Once again I'm stuck on the bleeding
> edge and before I
> > jump to 4.1.3 I'd like some proof that it will do something.
> > -
> > Tom Walker
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pearson, Dave [mailto:DCPearson AT SNOPUD DOT COM]
> > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 12:03 PM
> > > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > > Subject: Re: AIX Server - What's Stable?
> > >
> > >
> > > We have AIX 4.3.2  - We are using TSM 4.1.0 and having
> > > minimal problem with
> > > it. We did upgrade to TSM 4.1.2 and we had problem with our
> > > Archive jobs.
> > > One archive job we did usually ran for 2 hours. When we went
> > > to 4.1.2 it
> > > took over 15 hours... Not acceptable of course! So we went
> > > back to 4.1.0 and
> > > the archive ran okay.  IBM Support is still working on this.
> > > I seems that
> > > no one else in the ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > > <mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>   land
> > > was having this trouble.
> > >
> > > David C. Pearson
> > > IS Production Support Analyst
> > > System & Network Service
> > >
> >
> > This e-mail including any attachments is confidential and
> may be legally
> > privileged. If you have received it in error please advise
> the sender
> > immediately by return email and then delete it from your system. The
> > unauthorized use, distribution, copying or alteration of
> this email is
> > strictly forbidden.
> >
> > This email is from a unit or subsidiary of EMI Recorded Music, North
> > America
>

This e-mail including any attachments is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. If you have received it in error please advise the sender 
immediately by return email and then delete it from your system. The 
unauthorized use, distribution, copying or alteration of this email is strictly 
forbidden.

This email is from a unit or subsidiary of EMI Recorded Music, North America
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>