ADSM-L

Re: Archive (inspected) vs Backup (inspected)

2001-03-16 06:09:49
Subject: Re: Archive (inspected) vs Backup (inspected)
From: Gerrit van Zyl <gvanzyl AT FARITEC.CO DOT ZA>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 13:10:32 +0200
Steffan,

Why would ADSM skip 50000 files for archiving.  Their is about 20 files that
gives errors (open), the rest not.

number of objects inspected:  461,739
number of objects archived:   411,368

The schedule is to archive c: d: e:

Thanks and regards
Gerrit van Zyl


arhoads wrote:

> Gerrit,
>
> Yes.  Archive is not using the Include-Exclude list.
>
> Steffan
>
> Gerrit van Zyl wrote:
> >
> > Hi all TSM'ers,
> >
> > TSM Client 3.1.0.8 on NT
> > TSM Server 3.1.2.58 on AIX
> >
> > I have the following scenario and hope someone can explain this to me.
> > When archiving we get the following:
> >
> > 03/11/2001 03:54:57  ANE4952I (Session: 7758, Node: NTSRV01)  Total
> > number of objects inspected:  461,739
> > 03/11/2001 03:54:57  ANE4953I (Session: 7758, Node: NTSRV01)  Total
> > number of objects archived:   411,368
> >
> > When we do a incremental backup we get the following:
> >
> > 03/12/2001 22:57:23  ANE4952I (Session: 8193, Node: NTSRV01)  Total
> > number of objects inspected:  410,653
> > 03/12/2001 22:57:23  ANE4954I (Session: 8193, Node: NTSRV01)  Total
> > number of objects backed up:    3,414
> >
> > Why is there suce a huge difference between objects inspected in the two
> > cases (50000 objects)?  The files were not deleted!!  This is the same
> > everytime.
> >
> > Is archiving inspecting files differently than incremental backup?
> >
> > Thanks and regards.
> > Gerrit van Zyl
> >
> > IT Consultant
> > Faritec (Pty) Ltd